Conditionally optimal approximation algorithms for the girth of a directed graph
Name
LIPIcs-ICALP-2020-35.pdf
Description
Published version
Size
774.06 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
f8f8b4b25bf115791899e1b37168aa1c
Author(s)
Dalirrooyfard, Mina
Williams, Virginia Vassilevska
Date Issued
2020
Journal
Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
Citation
Dalirrooyfard, Mina and Williams, Virginia Vassilevska. 2020. "Conditionally optimal approximation algorithms for the girth of a directed graph." Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs, 168.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
© Mina Dalirrooyfard and Virginia Vassilevska Williams; licensed under Creative Commons License CC-BY 47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2020). The girth is one of the most basic graph parameters, and its computation has been studied for many decades. Under widely believed fine-grained assumptions, computing the girth exactly is known to require mn1−o(1) time, both in sparse and dense m-edge, n-node graphs, motivating the search for fast approximations. Fast good quality approximation algorithms for undirected graphs have been known for decades. For the girth in directed graphs, until recently the only constant factor approximation algorithms ran in O(nω) time, where ω < 2.373 is the matrix multiplication exponent. These algorithms have two drawbacks: (1) they only offer an improvement over the mn running time for dense graphs, and (2) the current fast matrix multiplication methods are impractical. The first constant factor approximation algorithm that runs in O(mn1−ε) time for ε > 0 and all sparsities m was only recently obtained by Chechik et al. [STOC 2020]; it is also combinatorial. It is known that a better than 2-approximation algorithm for the girth in dense directed unweighted graphs needs n3−o(1) time unless one uses fast matrix multiplication. Meanwhile, the best known approximation factor for a combinatorial algorithm running in O(mn1−ε) time (by Chechik et al.) is 3. Is the true answer 2 or 3? The main result of this paper is a (conditionally) tight approximation algorithm for directed graphs. First, we show that under a popular hardness assumption, any algorithm, even one that exploits fast matrix multiplication, would need to take at least mn1−o(1) time for some sparsity m if it achieves a (2 − ε)-approximation for any ε > 0. Second we give a 2-approximation algorithm for the girth of unweighted graphs running in Õ(mn3/4) time, and a (2 + ε)-approximation algorithm (for any ε > 0) that works in weighted graphs and runs in Õ(m√n) time. Our algorithms are combinatorial. We also obtain a (4+ε)-approximation of the girth running in Õ(mn√2−1) time, improving upon the previous best Õ(m√n) running time by Chechik et al. Finally, we consider the computation of roundtrip spanners. We obtain a (5 + ε)-approximate roundtrip spanner on Õ(n1.5/ε2) edges in Õ(m√n/ε2) time. This improves upon the previous approximation factor (8 + ε) of Chechik et al. for the same running time.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.35
