Thermodynamic analysis of brine management methods: Zero-discharge desalination and salinity-gradient power production
Name
CHUNG-Brine_Management-Desalination-2017-preprint.pdf
Size
14.01 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
aff4e0374737888547a58d22bb2f47d3
Author(s)
Chung, Hyung Won
Nayar, Kishor Govind
Swaminathan, Jaichander
Chehayeb, Karim Malek
Lienhard, John H
Date Issued
November 2016
Journal
Desalination
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Citation
Chung, Hyung Won, Kishor G. Nayar, Jaichander Swaminathan, Karim M. Chehayeb, and John H. Lienhard V. “Thermodynamic Analysis of Brine Management Methods: Zero-Discharge Desalination and Salinity-Gradient Power Production.” Desalination 404 (February 2017): 291–303.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Growing desalination capacity worldwide has made management of discharge brines an increasingly urgent environmental challenge. An important step in understanding how to choose between different brine management processes is to study the energetics of these processes. In this paper, we analyze two different ways of managing highly saline brines. The first method is complete separation with production of salts (i.e., zero-discharge desalination or ZDD). Thermodynamic limits of the ZDD process were calculated. This result was applied to the state-of-the-art industrial ZDD process to quantify how close these systems are to the thermodynamic limit, and to compare the energy consumption of the brine concentration step to the crystallization step. We conclude that the brine concentration step has more potential for improvement compared to the crystallization step. The second brine management method considered is salinity-gradient power generation through pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO), which utilizes the brine's high concentration to produce useful work while reducing its concentration by mixing the brine with a lower salinity stream in a controlled manner. We model the PRO system coupled with a desalination system using a detailed numerical optimization, which resulted in about 0.42 kW h/m3 of energy saving.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Rohsenow Kendall Heat Transfer Laboratory (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.11.022
