Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. The promise and perils of private voluntary regulation: Labor standards and work organization in two Mexican garment factories

The promise and perils of private voluntary regulation: Labor standards and work organization in two Mexican garment factories

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Locke-Romis-RIPE.pdf

Size

312.09 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

3c5bd5003d9c79f61eb97f8676ae461c

Author(s)
Locke, Richard M.
•
Romis, Monica
Date Issued
February 2010
Journal
Review of International Political Economy
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Citation
Locke, Richard M. and Romis, Monica (2010) 'The promise and perils of private voluntary regulation: Labor standards and work organization in two Mexican garment factories', Review of International Political Economy, 17:1, 45 - 74
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
What role can corporate codes of conduct play in monitoring compliance with international labor standards and improving working conditions in global supply chains? How does this system of private voluntary regulation relate to other strategies and regulatory approaches aimed at promoting just working conditions in global supply chains? This paper explores the potential and limitations of private voluntary regulation through a detailed matched pair case study of two factories supplying Nike, the world’s largest athletic footwear and apparel company. These two factories have many similarities - both are in Mexico, both are in the apparel industry, both produce more or less the same products for Nike (and other brands) and both are subject to the same code of conduct. On the surface, both factories appear to have similar employment (i.e., recruitment, training, remuneration) practices and they receive comparable scores when audited by Nike’s compliance staff. However, underlying (and somewhat obscured by) these apparent similarities, significant differences in actual labor conditions exist between these two factories. What drives these differences in working conditions? What does this imply for traditional systems of monitoring and codes of conduct? Field research conducted at these two factories reveals that beyond the code of conduct and various monitoring efforts aimed at enforcing it, workplace conditions and labor standards are shaped by very different patterns of work organization and human resource management policies. The promotion of these alternative work/human resources management practices can complement traditional monitoring efforts in ways that promoted improved labor standards.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/64420
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290902893230
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.