Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Grounding global environmental assessments through bottom-up futures based on local practices and perspectives

Grounding global environmental assessments through bottom-up futures based on local practices and perspectives

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

11625_2021_Article_1013.pdf

Size

1.7 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

273a8e96f37c3daa4a20125eb94089d7

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
art_5417628304449333335.zip (1.42 MB)
Author(s)
Pereira, Laura
•
Asrar, Ghassem R.
•
Bhargava, Rohan
•
Fisher, Laur H.
•
Hsu, Angel
•
Jabbour, Jason
•
Nel, Jeanne
•
Selomane, Odirilwe
•
Sitas, Nadia
•
Trisos, Christopher
more
Date Issued
August 13, 2021
Publisher
Springer Japan
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Abstract Future scenarios and pathways of potential development trajectories are powerful tools to assist with decision-making to address many sustainability challenges. Such scenarios play a major role in global environmental assessments (GEAs). Currently, however, scenarios in GEAs are mostly developed at the global level by experts and researchers, and locally imagined, bottom-up scenarios do not play a role in such assessments. In this paper, we argue that addressing future sustainability challenges for achieving more equitable development in GEAs requires a more explicit role for bottom-up inspired futures. To this end, this paper employs an innovative global assessment framework for exploring alternative futures that are grounded in local realities and existing practical actions, and that can be appropriately scaled to the required decision-making level. This framework was applied in the context of the UN’s Global Environment Outlook 6, a major example of a GEA. We developed novel methods for synthesizing insights from a wide range of local practices and perspectives into global futures. We collected information from crowdsourcing platforms, outcomes of participatory workshops in different regions of the world, and an assessment of reported regional outlooks. We analysed these according to a framework also used by an integrated assessment model in the same GEA. We conclude that bottom-up approaches to identify and assess transformative solutions that envision future pathways towards greater sustainability significantly strengthen current GEA scenario-development approaches. They provide decision makers with required actionable information based on tangible synergistic solutions that have been tested on the ground. This work has revealed that there are significant opportunities for the integration of bottom-up knowledge and insights into GEAs, to make such assessments more salient and valuable to decision makers.
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136888
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01013-x
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.