Edges and linearization: A reply
Name
Trinh-2010-Edges and linearizat.pdf
Size
783.49 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
3ad1b6ac3e2ebef25497d9a4b4a939aa
Author(s)
Trinh, Tue Huu
Date Issued
October 2010
Journal
Theoretical Linguistics
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter
Citation
Trinh, Tue. “Edges and Linearization: A Reply.” Theoretical Linguistics 36, no. 1 (January 2010). © 2010 Walter de Gruyte
Version
Final published version
Abstract
This is my reply to the commentaries on Trinh (2009). I thank the commentators – Enoch Aboh, Josef Bayer, Nigel Duffield, Roland Hinterhölzl, Anders Holmberg, Shinichiro Ishihara and Gereon Müller – for their helpful critiques, which point out several shortcomings of the target paper, opened up areas where new predictions can be made and raised questions to be investigated in future research. It is unfortunate that these critiques and this reply did not appear in the same volume. The first section of the reply will hence be a brief summary of my proposal. The theory will be presented in a slightly different way, more transparent than the original formulation but equivalent with it in content. It is my hope that the reformulation will address some of the questions raised in the commentaries. Other issues are discussed in the sections that follow
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2010.007
