Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Bounding sequence extremal functions with formations

Bounding sequence extremal functions with formations

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Geneson-2014-Bounding sequence.pdf

Size

361.58 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

02d3b8c856f08c9f2782da598e1b5553

Author(s)
Geneson, Jesse
•
Prasad, Rohil
•
Tidor, Jonathan
Date Issued
August 2014
Journal
Electronic Journal of Combinatorics
Publisher
Electronic Journal of Combinatorics
Citation
Geneson, Jesse, Rohil Prasad, and Jonathan Tidor. "Bounding sequence extremal functions with formations." The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics Volume 21, Issue 3 (2014).
Version
Final published version
Abstract
An (r,s)-formation is a concatenation of s permutations of r letters. If u is a sequence with r distinct letters, then let Ex(u,n) be the maximum length of any r-sparse sequence with n distinct letters which has no subsequence isomorphic to u. For every sequence u define fw(u), the formation width of u, to be the minimum s for which there exists r such that there is a subsequence isomorphic to u in every (r,s)-formation. We use fw(u) to prove upper bounds on Ex(u,n) for sequences u such that u contains an alternation with the same formation width as u. We generalize Nivasch's bounds on Ex((ab)[superscript t],n) by showing that fw((12…l)[superscript t]) = 2t − 1 and Ex((12…l)[superscript t],n) = n2[superscript [1 over (t−2)!]α(n)t−2±O(α(n)t−3)] for every l ≥ 2 and t ≥ 3, such that α(n) denotes the inverse Ackermann function. Upper bounds on Ex((12…l)[superscript t],n) have been used in other papers to bound the maximum number of edges in k-quasiplanar graphs on n vertices with no pair of edges intersecting in more than O(1) points. If u is any sequence of the form avav′a such that a is a letter, v is a nonempty sequence excluding a with no repeated letters and v′ is obtained from v by only moving the first letter of v to another place in v, then we show that fw(u) = 4 and Ex(u,n) = Θ(nα(n)). Furthermore we prove that fw(abc(acb)[superscript t]) = 2t + 1 and Ex(abc(acb)[superscript t],n) = n2[superscript [1 over (t−1)!]α(n)t−1±O(α(n)t−2)] for every t ≥ 2.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematics
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
http://creativecommons.org/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/91152
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.37236/3663
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.