Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from Health Care Markets

Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from Health Care Markets

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

684986.pdf

Size

424.62 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

cec02e48e2bbdc32e38088a77608109f

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
sword-2018-03-01.original.zip (354.4 KB)
Author(s)
Williams, Heidi L.
•
Williams, Heidi L
Date Issued
November 2016
Journal
Innovation Policy and the Economy
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Citation
Williams, Heidi L. “Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from Health Care Markets.” Innovation Policy and the Economy 16, no. 1 (January 2016): 53–87. © 2016 the National Bureau of Economic Research
Version
Final published version
Abstract
A long theoretical literature has analyzed optimal patent policy design, yet there is very little empirical evidence on a key parameter needed to apply these models in practice: the relationship between patent strength and research investments. I argue that the dearth of empirical evidence on this question reflects two key challenges: the difficulty of measuring specific research investments and the fact that finding variation in patent protection is difficult. I then summarize the findings of two recent studies that have made progress in starting to overcome these empirical challenges by combining new data sets measuring biomedical research investments with novel sources of variation in the effective intellectual property protection provided to different inventions. The first study, Budish, Roin, and Williams (2015a), documents evidence consistent with patents affecting the rate and direction of research investments in the context of cancer drug development. The second study, Williams (2013), documents evidence that one form of intellectual property rights on the human genome had quantitatively important impacts on follow-on scientific research and commercial development. I discuss the relevance of both studies for patent policy and discuss directions for future research.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114270
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1086/684986
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.