Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments

The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

SSRN-id2916951.pdf

Size

259.92 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

f36451b9dc38326e413fe7111237aefa

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
sword-2018-10-18.original.zip (240.2 KB)
Author(s)
Bansak, Kirk
•
Hainmueller, Jens
•
Hopkins, Daniel J.
•
Yamamoto, Teppei
Date Issued
January 2018
Journal
Political Analysis
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Citation
Bansak, Kirk, et al. “The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis, vol. 26, no. 01, Jan. 2018, pp. 112–19. © 2018 The Authors
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
In recent years, political and social scientists have made increasing use of conjoint survey designs to study decision-making. Here, we study a consequential question which researchers confront when implementing conjoint designs: How many choice tasks can respondents perform before survey satisficing degrades response quality? To answer the question, we run a set of experiments where respondents are asked to complete as many as 30 conjoint tasks. Experiments conducted through Amazon's Mechanical Turk and Survey Sampling International demonstrate the surprising robustness of conjoint designs, as there are detectable but quite limited increases in survey satisficing as the number of tasks increases. Our evidence suggests that in similar study contexts researchers can assign dozens of tasks without substantial declines in response quality. Key Words: conjoint analysis, survey experiments, survey fatigue, response bias
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118642
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1017/PAN.2017.40
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.