How to quantify coherence: Distinguishing speakable and unspeakable notions
Name
PhysRevA.94.052324.pdf
Size
518.66 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
af8d99cfb52cef6b27ad3d63e9d4c152
Author(s)
Spekkens, Robert W.
Marvian Mashhad, Iman
Date Issued
November 2016
Journal
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society
Citation
Marvian, Iman, and Robert W. Spekkens. “How to Quantify Coherence: Distinguishing Speakable and Unspeakable Notions.” Physical Review A 94.5 (2016): n. pag. © 2016 American Physical Society
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Quantum coherence is a critical resource for many operational tasks. Understanding how to quantify and manipulate it also promises to have applications for a diverse set of problems in theoretical physics. For certain applications, however, one requires coherence between the eigenspaces of specific physical observables, such as energy, angular momentum, or photon number, and it makes a difference which eigenspaces appear in the superposition. For others, there is a preferred set of subspaces relative to which coherence is deemed a resource, but it is irrelevant which of the subspaces appear in the superposition. We term these two types of coherence unspeakable and speakable, respectively. We argue that a useful approach to quantifying and characterizing unspeakable coherence is provided by the resource theory of asymmetry when the symmetry group is a group of translations, and we translate a number of prior results on asymmetry into the language of coherence. We also highlight some of the applications of this approach, for instance, in the context of quantum metrology, quantum speed limits, quantum thermodynamics, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The question of how best to treat speakable coherence as a resource is also considered. We review a popular approach in terms of operations that preserve the set of incoherent states, propose an alternative approach in terms of operations that are covariant under dephasing, and we outline the challenge of providing a physical justification for either approach. Finally, we note some mathematical connections that hold among the different approaches to quantifying coherence.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052324
