A review of nonlinear oscillatory shear tests: Analysis and application of large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS)
Name
McKinley_A review of nonlinear.pdf
Size
4.05 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
e4cea050ab8da825ee81700bdcbd37b7
Author(s) • • • • • • • •
Hyun, Kyu
Wilhelm, Manfred
Klein, Christopher O.
Cho, Kwang Soo
Nam, Jung Gun
Ahn, Kyung Hyun
Lee, Seung Jong
Ewoldt, Randy H.
McKinley, Gareth H.
Date Issued
March 2011
Journal
Progress in Polymer Science
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Hyun, Kyu, Manfred Wilhelm, Christopher O. Klein, Kwang Soo Cho, Jung Gun Nam, Kyung Hyun Ahn, Seung Jong Lee, Randy H. Ewoldt, and Gareth H. McKinley. “A Review of Nonlinear Oscillatory Shear Tests: Analysis and Application of Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear (LAOS).” Progress in Polymer Science 36, no. 12 (December 2011): 1697–1753.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Dynamic oscillatory shear tests are common in rheology and have been used to investigate a wide range of soft matter and complex fluids including polymer melts and solutions, block copolymers, biological macromolecules, polyelectrolytes, surfactants, suspensions, emulsions and beyond. More specifically, small amplitude oscillatory shear (SAOS) tests have become the canonical method for probing the linear viscoelastic properties of these complex fluids because of the firm theoretical background [1], [2], [3] and [4] and the ease of implementing suitable test protocols. However, in most processing operations the deformations can be large and rapid: it is therefore the nonlinear material properties that control the system response. A full sample characterization thus requires well-defined nonlinear test protocols. Consequently there has been a recent renewal of interest in exploiting large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) tests to investigate and quantify the nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of complex fluids. In terms of the experimental input, both LAOS and SAOS require the user to select appropriate ranges of strain amplitude (γ[subscript 0]) and frequency (ω). However, there is a distinct difference in the analysis of experimental output, i.e. the material response. At sufficiently large strain amplitude, the material response will become nonlinear in LAOS tests and the familiar material functions used to quantify the linear behavior in SAOS tests are no longer sufficient. For example, the definitions of the linear viscoelastic moduli G′(ω) and G″(ω) are based inherently on the assumption that the stress response is purely sinusoidal (linear). However, a nonlinear stress response is not a perfect sinusoid and therefore the viscoelastic moduli are not uniquely defined; other methods are needed for quantifying the nonlinear material response under LAOS deformation. In the present review article, we first summarize the typical nonlinear responses observed with complex fluids under LAOS deformations. We then introduce and critically compare several methods that quantify the nonlinear oscillatory stress response. We illustrate the utility and sensitivity of these protocols by investigating the nonlinear response of various complex fluids over a wide range of frequency and amplitude of deformation, and show that LAOS characterization is a rigorous test for rheological models and advanced quality control.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.002