Measurement of the D[superscript *](2010)[superscript +] natural linewidth and the D[superscript *](2010)[superscript +] - D[superscript 0] mass difference
Name
Lees-2013-Measurement of the D.pdf
Size
1.14 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
963cd10c557ce83840cca1f1d149fa7f
Author(s) • • •
Sciolla, Gabriella
Flood, Kevin T.
Cowan, Ray F
Dujmic, Denis
Date Issued
September 2013
Journal
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society
Citation
Lees, J. P., V. Poireau, V. Tisserand, E. Grauges, A. Palano, G. Eigen, B. Stugu, et al. “Measurement of the D[superscript *](2010)[superscript +] natural linewidth and the D[superscript *](2010)[superscript +] - D[superscript 0] mass difference.” Physical Review D 88, no. 5 (September 2013). © 2013 American Physical Society
Version
Final published version
Abstract
We measure the mass difference, Δm[subscript 0], between the D[superscript *](2010)[superscript +] and the D[superscript 0] and the natural linewidth, Γ, of the transition D[superscript *](2010)[superscript +] → D[superscript 0]π[superscript +]. The data were recorded with the BABAR detector at center-of-mass energies at and near the Υ(4S) resonance, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of approximately 477 fb[superscript −1]. The D[superscript 0] is reconstructed in the decay modes D[superscript 0] → K[superscript −]π[superscript +] and D[superscript 0] → K[superscript −]π[superscript +]π[superscript −]π[superscript +]. For the decay mode D[superscript 0] → K[superscript −]π[superscript +] we obtain Γ = (83.4 ± 1.7 ± 1.5) keV and Δm[subscript 0] = (145425.6 ± 0.6 ± 1.8) keV, where the quoted errors are statistical and systematic, respectively. For the D[superscript 0] → K[superscript −]π[superscript +]π[superscript −]π[superscript +] mode we obtain Γ = (83.2 ± 1.5 ± 2.6) keV and Δm[subscript 0] = (145426.6 ± 0.5 ± 2.0) keV. The combined measurements yield Γ = (83.3 ± 1.2 ± 1.4) keV and Δm[subscript 0] = (145425.9 ± 0.4 ± 1.7) keV; the width is a factor of approximately 12 times more precise than the previous value, while the mass difference is a factor of approximately 6 times more precise.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Nuclear Science
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.052003