Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. How Does AI Transform Cyber Risk Management?

How Does AI Transform Cyber Risk Management?

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

systems-13-00835-v2.pdf

Description
Published version
Size

1.55 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

fa7e21914aaed81f22657fa7792bbf63

sword-2025-11-25T17:36:13.original.xml (130 B)
Original SWORD entry document
Author(s)
Zeijlemaker, Sander
•
Lemiesa, Yaphet K
•
Schröer, Saskia Laura
•
Abhishta, Abhishta
•
Siegel, Michael
Date Issued
September 23, 2025
Journal
Systems
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citation
Zeijlemaker, S., Lemiesa, Y. K., Schröer, S. L., Abhishta, A., & Siegel, M. (2025). How Does AI Transform Cyber Risk Management? Systems, 13(10), 835.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Digital transformation embeds smart cities, e-health, and Industry 4.0 into critical infrastructures, thereby increasing reliance on digital systems and exposure to cyber threats and boosting complexity and dependency. Research involving over 200 executives reveals that under rising complexity, only 15% of cyber risk investments are effective, leaving most organizations misaligned or vulnerable. In this context, the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in cybersecurity requires systemic scrutiny. This study analyzes how AI reshapes systemic structures in cyber risk management through a multi-method approach: literature review, expert workshops with practitioners and policymakers, and a structured kill chain analysis of the Colonial Pipeline attack. The findings reveal three new feedback loops: (1) deceptive defense structures that misdirect adversaries while protecting assets, (2) two-step success-to-success attacks that disable defenses before targeting infrastructure, and (3) autonomous proliferation when AI applications go rogue. These dynamics shift cyber risk from linear patterns to adaptive, compounding interactions. The principal conclusion is that AI both amplifies and mitigates systemic risk. The core recommendation is to institutionalize deception in security standards and address drifting AI-powered systems. Deliverables include validated systemic structures, policy options, and a foundation for creating future simulation models to support strategic cyber risk management investment.
MIT Department
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/164015
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13100835
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.