Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological clinical trials

Sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological clinical trials

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

e001175.full.pdf

Size

701.96 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

a6f6172940b5dff521e203a1ed793dd2

Author(s)
Nakayama, Luis Filipe
•
Mitchell, William Greig
•
Shapiro, Skyler
•
Santiago, Alvina Pauline D.
•
Phanphruk, Warachaya
•
Kalua, Khumbo
•
Celi, Leo Anthony
•
Regatieri, Caio Vinicius Saito
Date Issued
February 2023
Publisher
BMJ
Citation
Nakayama, Luis Filipe, Mitchell, William Greig, Shapiro, Skyler, Santiago, Alvina Pauline D., Phanphruk, Warachaya et al. 2023. "Sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological clinical trials." 8 (1).
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Introduction In ophthalmology, clinical trials (CTs) guide the treatment of diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, myopia, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma and keratoconus with distinct presentations, pathological characteristics and responses to treatment in minority populations. Reporting gender and race and ethnicity in healthcare studies is currently recommended by National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines to ensure representativeness and generalisability; however, CT results that include this information have been limited in the past 30 years. The objective of this review is to analyse the sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological phases III and IV CT based on publicly available data. Methods This study included phases III and IV complete ophthalmological CT available from clinicaltrials.org, and describes the country distribution, race and ethnicity description and gender, and funding characteristics. Results After a screening process, we included 654 CTs, with findings that corroborate the previous CT reviews’ findings that most ophthalmological participants are white and from high-income countries. A description of race and ethnicity is reported in 37.1% of studies but less frequently included within the most studied ophthalmological specialty area (cornea, retina, glaucoma and cataracts). The incidence of race and ethnicity reporting has improved during the past 7 years. Discussion Although NIH and FDA promote guidelines to improve generalisability in healthcare studies, the inclusion of race and ethnicity in publications and diverse participants in ophthalmological CT is still limited. Actions from the research community and related stakeholders are necessary to increase representativeness and guarantee generalisability in ophthalmological research results to optimise care and reduce related healthcare disparities.
Subjects
Ophthalmology
MIT Department
Harvard--MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology. Laboratory for Computational Physiology
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/148464
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001175
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.