Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  3. CSAIL Digital Archive
  4. CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)
  5. Investigating shape representation in area V4 with HMAX: Orientation and Grating selectivities

Investigating shape representation in area V4 with HMAX: Orientation and Grating selectivities

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

MIT-CSAIL-TR-2003-019.ps

Size

19.22 MB

Format

PostScript

Checksum (MD5)

8e220fd12e24423a8cfe16a401311a9d

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

MIT-CSAIL-TR-2003-019.pdf

Size

1.2 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

3018488d62ebc025fac358d7f896d510

Author(s)
Kouh, Minjoon
•
Riesenhuber, Maximilian
Date Issued
September 8, 2003
Series/Report no.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Abstract
The question of how shape is represented is of central interest to understanding visual processing in cortex. While tuning properties of the cells in early part of the ventral visual stream, thought to be responsible for object recognition in the primate, are comparatively well understood, several different theories have been proposed regarding tuning in higher visual areas, such as V4. We used the model of object recognition in cortex presented by Riesenhuber and Poggio (1999), where more complex shape tuning in higher layers is the result of combining afferent inputs tuned to simpler features, and compared the tuning properties of model units in intermediate layers to those of V4 neurons from the literature. In particular, we investigated the issue of shape representation in visual area V1 and V4 using oriented bars and various types of gratings (polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian), as used in several physiology experiments. Our computational model was able to reproduce several physiological findings, such as the broadening distribution of the orientation bandwidths and the emergence of a bias toward non-Cartesian stimuli. Interestingly, the simulation results suggest that some V4 neurons receive input from afferents with spatially separated receptive fields, leading to experimentally testable predictions. However, the simulations also show that the stimulus set of Cartesian and non-Cartesian gratings is not sufficiently complex to probe shape tuning in higher areas, necessitating the use of more complex stimulus sets.
Subjects
AI
Shape Tuning
Shape Representation
Features
HMAX
Visual Cortex
Gratings
V4
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/30424
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.