NEC FUTURE Preliminary Alternatives Report: Public Comment
Name
esd-wp-2013-11.pdf
Size
282.69 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
df7aec17709945d66b3eaa43f7de11a1
Author(s) • • • • • •
Sussman, Joseph M.
Archila, Andres F.
Carlson, S. Joel
Pena-Alcaraz, Maite
Soshi, Kawakami
Westrom, Ryan J.
Stein, Naomi
Date Issued
June 2013
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
Series/Report no.
ESD Working Papers;ESD-WP-2013-11
Abstract
The United States Department of Transportation's Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is currently in the early stages of a planning process to define a 30-year passenger rail investment plan for the Northeast Corridor (NEC), between Boston and Washington, D.C. In the Spring of 2013, NEC FUTURE (the name of the planning process), released a Preliminary Alternatives Report, containing 15 possible alternatives for passenger rail infrastructure investment.
This working paper contains a memo from the Regional Transportation Planning and High Speed Rail Research Group at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) responding to the Preliminary Alternatives Report, as well as following up on the group's previous public comments to NEC FUTURE (ESD-WP-2012-27 NEC FUTURE Tier I Scoping Process: Public Comment). The memo focuses on the group's reactions in three areas: “goals and objectives, and evaluation of the alternatives,” “planning under uncertainty and flexible alternatives,” and “institutional assumptions.” These comments also build on the knowledge gained from report prepared for and funded by the Institute for Transportation Policy Studies (ITPS) in Tokyo, Japan, entitled Transportation in the Northeast Corridor of the U.S.: A Multimodal and Intermodal Conceptual Framework.
Persistent DSpace Link