Rank Has Its Privileges: Explaining Why Laboratory Safety Is a Persistent Challenge
Name
10551_2022_5169_ReferencePDF.pdf
Size
1023.63 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
469760925311dfd5e53815e4acee6de4
Author(s)
Basbug, Gokce
Cavicchi, Ayn
Silbey, Susan S.
Date Issued
June 19, 2022
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Citation
Basbug, Gokce, Cavicchi, Ayn and Silbey, Susan S. 2022. "Rank Has Its Privileges: Explaining Why Laboratory Safety Is a Persistent Challenge."
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Abstract
Environmental, health, and safety management systems have become common in research settings to improve laboratory safety through systematic observation and self-regulation. However, there is scant empirical evidence assessing whether these surveillance and inspection systems meet their intended objectives. Using data from safety inspections in research laboratories at a large university, we investigate whether conducting inspections, and recording and reporting findings back to the formally responsible actors (i.e., principal investigator scientists) lead to the improvement of regulatory compliance. Our analyses identify a population of well-funded, high-status, tenured researchers whose non-compliant practices persist. Our interviews with environmental, health, and safety personnel suggest that higher-status actors disengage from the regulatory system, the compliance officers, and the system’s feedback process by their variable recognition and acknowledgment of relevant regulations, attention to the inspection reports, and responses to the feedback concerning repair of the unsafe situation. This study extends previous literature on regulatory compliance by providing evidence for the role of power and status in explaining actor-level non-compliant behavior.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Anthropology
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05169-z
