Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Rate-distance tradeoff and resource costs for all-optical quantum repeaters

Rate-distance tradeoff and resource costs for all-optical quantum repeaters

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

PhysRevA.95.012304.pdf

Size

994.71 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

dc0d022d1b2587fa41b24edd959234ab

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
sword-2018-08-28.original.zip (846.76 KB)
Author(s)
Krovi, Hari
•
Guha, Saikat
•
Pant, Mihir
•
Englund, Dirk R.
Date Issued
January 2017
Journal
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Citation
Pant, Mihir et al. “Rate-Distance Tradeoff and Resource Costs for All-Optical Quantum Repeaters.” Physical Review A 95, 1 (January 2017): 012304 © 2017 American Physical Society
Version
Final published version
Abstract
We present a resource-performance tradeoff of an all-optical quantum repeater that uses photon sources, linear optics, photon detectors, and classical feedforward at each repeater node, but no quantum memories. We show that the quantum-secure key rate has the form R(eta) = D eta(s) bits per mode, where I) is the end-to-end channel's transmissivity, and the constants D and s are functions of various device inefficiencies and the resource constraint, such as the number of available photon sources at each repeater node. Even with lossy devices, we show that it is possible to attain s < 1, and in turn outperform the maximum key rate attainable without quantum repeaters, R-direct(eta) = log2(1-eta)approximate to(1/ln 2)eta bits per mode for eta << 1, beyond a certain total range L, where eta similar to e(-alpha L) in optical fiber. We also propose a suite of modifications to a recently proposed all-optical repeater protocol that ours builds upon, which lower the number of photon sources required to create photonic clusters at the repeaters so as to outperform R-direct(eta), from similar to 10(11) to similar to 10(6) photon sources per repeater node. We show that the optimum separation between repeater nodes is independent of the total range L and is around 1.5 km for assumptions we make on various device losses.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/117768
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVA.95.012304
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.