Toward Understanding the Impact of Visual Themes and Embellishment on Performance, Engagement, and Self-Efficacy in Educational Games
Name
kao2017aera.pdf
Size
36.57 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
8c853264b78701fdfba68cd7f2a5787b
Author(s)
Kao, Dominic
Harrell Jr, Douglas Alan
Date Issued
April 2017
Journal
2017 American Educational Research Association Conference
Publisher
American Educational Research Association
Citation
Kao, Dominic and D. Fox Harrell. "Toward Understanding the Impact of Visual Themes and Embellishment on Performance, Engagement, and
Self-Efficacy in Educational Games." 2017 American Educational Research Association Conference, 17 April - 1 May, 2017, San Antonio, Texas, American Educational Research Association, 2017.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
The results of over twenty-five years of research seem clear: the addition of
seductive visual details in video games hinders performance of learners (Garner, Gillingham, & White, 1989; Thalheimer, 2004; Rey, 2012). Yet, countless other research results propose the opposite: that visual embellishments and well-designed ambiguity instead improve learners’ performance, engagement, and self-efficacy (Tierney, Corwin, Fullerton, & Ragusa, 2014; Wilson et. al. 2009; Scott & Ghinea, 2013). To shed light on this apparent contradiction, we devised a particular experiment using game skins to implement variations in visual themes of a computer game. Game skins are coherent, interchangeable sets of graphical assets
that all implement the same underlying game structure while varying the visual appearance (for instance, see Figure 3). In particular, we implemented the following four game skins labeled and described as follows: 1) Generic theme with no embellishments (simple flat color background), 2) Fantasy game theme (forest, snow, and desert adventure backgrounds), 3) STEM-oriented theme (computer circuitry background), and 4) Choice (the user picks one of the previous three Kao & Harrell, AERA 2017 options). Our goal is determining if there are differences in performance, engagement, and self-efficacy between conditions. The upshot is that the generic
condition participants had highest performance (levels) and had highest
programming self-efficacy—followed by choice, fantasy game setting, circuitry. However, ordering of conditions for engagement was precisely opposite the trend for performance. We conclude by discussing the trade-offs between the two diametrically opposed approaches to game themes and embellishment: instrumental game skins vs. thematic and deliberately embellished game skins.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
http://www.aera.net/Publications/Online-Paper-Repository
