Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. The lightness of existence and the origami of “French” anthropology: Latour, Descola, Viveiros de Castro, Meillassoux, and their so-called ontological turn

The lightness of existence and the origami of “French” anthropology: Latour, Descola, Viveiros de Castro, Meillassoux, and their so-called ontological turn

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

fischer_Lightness_Existence.pdf

Size

278.86 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

51f64777e272e3574a1317446cac1d4c

Author(s)
Fischer, Michael M. J.
Date Issued
June 2014
Journal
HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory
Publisher
HAU Network of Ethnographic Theory, University of Edinburgh, Department of Anthropology
Citation
Fischer, Michael M. J. “The Lightness of Existence and the Origami of ‘French’ Anthropology: Latour, Descola, Viveiros de Castro, Meillassoux, and Their so-Called Ontological Turn.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4, no. 1 (June 23, 2014): 331.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Latour turns to Wittgensteinian or Lyotardian language games, and Silversteinian deixis and metapragmatics, as formal means of distinquishing modern European discursive categories and institutions, each defined by three criteria: the right pre-position, discontinuity from other language games, and felicity conditions. Double-click and the snake of knowledge are metaphorical reminders to not efface the labor of invention and maintenance. In lectures on Gaia, Latour turns toward a Durkheimian politics of the Anthropocene. Descola charts Siberian and North American groups on a north–south historical gradient from animism to analogism, and Amazonian cultural groups as animist transformational sets, reviving a human geography tradition, connecting to Latour’s project through wide-mesh networking of human–nonhuman cosmo-logical modes and relations, and contesting Viveiros de Castro’s uniform Amazonian predation cosmology and multinaturalism–uniculturalism, supporting the earlier work on contrastive Amazonian linguistics. We need not celebrate “humanity as technological detour,” but focus on the “peopling of technologies.”
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96009
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.018
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.