A framework to analyze sulfate versus chloride selectivity in nanofiltration
Name
c8ew00847g.pdf
Size
4.06 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
b820b7c002efb2e786611efdfedd83a9
Author(s) •
Roy, Yagnaseni
Lienhard, John H
Date Issued
January 2019
Journal
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Citation
Roy, Yagnaseni, and John H. Lienhard. “A Framework to Analyze Sulfate Versus Chloride Selectivity in Nanofiltration.” Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 5, 3 (2019): 585–598 © Royal Society of Chemistry
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The preferential removal of sodium sulfate over sodium chloride (fractionation) by nanofiltration (NF) is studied. A fractionation metric, M, is defined, and a simple set of equations are derived to describe its variation due to operating parameters, such as temperature and pressure. The use of these equations to explain known behavior of NF systems and suggest improvements in system or membrane design is demonstrated. Furthermore, the derived framework is applicable to all membranes used in pressure-driven technologies, without detailed characterization of specific membrane properties, such as structural parameters (pore radius, active layer thickness, tortuosity, porosity) or charge-based parameters. Given that the principal applications of NF involve the selective removal of multivalent ions over monovalent ions, the introduced metric provides a direct measure of its efficacy in such applications, and is shown to be more accurate in some cases than comparing salt rejection ratios, as usually done. Finally, the concept of ‘breakthrough’, commonly observed as the point at which rejection ratio begins to decrease with increase in pressure, is mathematically described, and its implication on selectivity discussed.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial 3.0 unported license
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ew00847g