Simulations of the observed ‘jump’ in the West African monsoon and its underlying dynamics using the MIT regional climate model
Name
Endo_et_al-2018-GeoHealth.pdf
Size
6.43 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
6732dbc97295415270bdc3e4f78677b5
Author(s)
Im, Eun Soon
Eltahir, Elfatih A. B.
Date Issued
March 2018
Journal
International Journal of Climatology
Publisher
Wiley Blackwell
Citation
Im, Eun-Soon and Elfatih A. B. Eltahir. “Simulations of the Observed ‘jump’ in the West African Monsoon and Its Underlying Dynamics Using the MIT Regional Climate Model.” International Journal of Climatology 38, 2 (July 2017): 841–852 © 2017 The Authors
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The observed seasonal migration of rainfall associated with the West African monsoon (WAM) is characterized by two regimes of relatively intense rainfall: an early, intense peak over the Guinean Coast during late May to early July; and a late, less-intense peak over the Sahel during mid-July to mid-September. The transition between these two rainfall regimes occurs relatively quickly around the beginning of July. This quick transition can be described as a ‘jump’ of the WAM into the continent. Eltahir and Gong (1996) proposed a theory for the WAM whereby the solar radiation forcing during the summer shapes a distribution of boundary-layer entropy that peaks over the continent. By assuming a quasi-equilibrium balance between moist convection and the large-scale radiative forcing, the distribution of boundary-layer entropy can be linked to the absolute vorticity at the tropopause. According to this analytical theory, the onset of the monsoon, characterized by the ‘jump’, reflects of a nonlinear shift from a radiative-convective equilibrium regime to an angular momentum conserving regime that would only occur when the value of absolute vorticity in the upper troposphere approaches a threshold of zero. It is because, when the absolute vorticity is significantly different from zero, then the air as a rotating fluid is too rigid to exhibit a meridional overturning. Here, we use the MIT regional climate model (MRCM) to test this theory further and reach a couple of conclusions. First, MRCM succeeds in reproducing the main features of the observed rainfall distribution, including the ‘jump’. Second, analysis of the rainfall, vorticity, entropy, and wind fields simulated by the model reveals a dynamical picture consistent with the proposed theory.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Parsons Laboratory for Environmental Science and Engineering (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1002/JOC.5214
