Lamellipodial Versus Filopodial Mode of the Actin Nanomachinery: Pivotal Role of the Filament Barbed End
Name
Gertler_Lamellipodial versus.pdf
Size
1.49 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
868e62c441101eb2d369abc9137c456f
Author(s) • • • • •
Mejillano, Marisan R.
Kojima, Shin-ichiro
Applewhite, Derek Anthony
Svitkina, Tatyana M.
Borisy, Gary G.
Gertler, Frank
Date Issued
August 2004
Journal
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Mejillano, Marisan R., Shin-ichiro Kojima, Derek Anthony Applewhite, Frank B. Gertler, Tatyana M. Svitkina, and Gary G. Borisy. “Lamellipodial Versus Filopodial Mode of the Actin Nanomachinery.” Cell 118, no. 3 (August 2004): 363-373. Copyright © 2004 Cell Press
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Understanding how a particular cell type expresses the lamellipodial or filopodial form of the actin machinery is essential to understanding a cell's functional interactions. To determine how a cell “chooses” among these alternative modes of “molecular hardware,” we tested the role of key proteins that affect actin filament barbed ends. Depletion of capping protein (CP) by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) caused loss of lamellipodia and explosive formation of filopodia. The knockdown phenotype was rescued by a CP mutant refractory to shRNA, but not by another barbed-end capper, gelsolin, demonstrating that the phenotype was specific for CP. In Ena/VASP deficient cells, CP depletion resulted in ruffling instead of filopodia. We propose a model for selection of lamellipodial versus filopodial organization in which CP is a negative regulator of filopodia formation and Ena/VASP has recruiting/activating functions downstream of actin filament elongation in addition to its previously suggested anticapping and antibranching activities.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biology
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.019