Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Shaving Logs via Large Sieve Inequality: Faster Algorithms for Sparse Convolution and More

Shaving Logs via Large Sieve Inequality: Faster Algorithms for Sparse Convolution and More

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

3618260.3649605.pdf

Size

826.15 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

025f0add6188269a5c893b5f5441998d

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
3618260.3649605.zip (721.21 KB)
Author(s)
Jin, Ce
•
Xu, Yinzhan
Date Issued
June 10, 2024
Publisher
ACM|Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
Citation
Jin, Ce and Xu, Yinzhan. 2024. "Shaving Logs via Large Sieve Inequality: Faster Algorithms for Sparse Convolution and More."
Version
Final published version
Abstract
In sparse convolution-type problems, a common technique is to hash the input integers modulo a random prime 𝑝 ∈ [𝑄/2, 𝑄] for some parameter 𝑄, which reduces the range of the input integers while preserving their additive structure. However, this hash family suffers from two drawbacks, which led to bottlenecks in many state-of-the-art algorithms: (1) The collision probability of two elements from [𝑁] is 𝑂( log 𝑁 𝑄 ) rather than 𝑂( 1 𝑄 ); (2) It is difficult to derandomize the choice of 𝑝; known derandomization techniques lead to super-logarithmic overhead [Chan, Lewenstein STOC’15]. In this paper, we partially overcome these drawbacks in certain scenarios, via novel applications of the large sieve inequality from analytic number theory. Consequently, we obtain the following improved algorithms for various problems (in the standard word RAM model): Sparse Nonnegative Convolution: We obtain an 𝑂(𝑡 log 𝑡)- time Las Vegas algorithm that computes the convolution 𝐴 ★ 𝐵 of two nonnegative integer vectors 𝐴, 𝐵, where 𝑡 is the output sparsity ∥𝐴 ★ 𝐵∥0. Moreover, our algorithm terminates in 𝑂(𝑡 log 𝑡) time with 1 − 1/poly(𝑡) probability. This simultaneously improves the 𝑂(𝑡 log 𝑡 log log 𝑡)-time Las Vegas algorithm [Bringmann, Fischer, Nakos SODA’22] and the Monte Carlo 𝑂(𝑡 log 𝑡)-time algorithm with failure probability 2 − √ log 𝑡 [Bringmann, Fischer, Nakos STOC’21]. Text-to-Pattern Hamming Distances: Given a length-𝑚 pattern 𝑃 and a length-𝑛 text 𝑇 , we obtain an 𝑂(𝑛 √︁ 𝑚 log log𝑚)-time deterministic algorithm that exactly computes the Hamming distance between 𝑃 and every length-𝑚 substring of 𝑇 . This improves the previous 𝑂(𝑛 √ 𝑚(log𝑚 log log𝑚) 1/4 )-time deterministic algorithm [Chan, Jin, Vassilevska Williams, Xu FOCS’23] and nearly matches their 𝑂(𝑛 √ 𝑚)-time Las Vegas algorithm. Sparse General Convolution: For sparse convolution with possibly negative input, all previous approaches required Ω(𝑡 log2 𝑡) time, where 𝑡 is the maximum of input and output sparsity, and an important question left open by [Bringmann, Fischer, Nakos STOC’21] is whether this can be improved. We make partial progress towards solving this question by giving a Monte Carlo 𝑂(𝑡 log 𝑡) time algorithm in the restricted case where the length 𝑁 of the input vectors satisfies 𝑁 ≤ 𝑡 1.99 .
Description
STOC ’24, June 24–28, 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155705
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1145/3618260.3649605
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.