Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Press ECCS to Doubt (Your Causal Graph)

Press ECCS to Doubt (Your Causal Graph)

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

3665601.3669842.pdf

Size

1.1 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

bf1becfb6431cf7bbfc4e55ddfe01a40

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
3665601.3669842.zip (991.08 KB)
Author(s)
Markakis, Markos
•
Zhang, Ziyu
•
Shahout, Rana
•
Gao, Trinity
•
Liu, Chunwei
•
Sabek, Ibrahim
•
Cafarella, Michael
Date Issued
June 9, 2024
Publisher
ACM
Citation
Markakis, Markos, Zhang, Ziyu, Shahout, Rana, Gao, Trinity, Liu, Chunwei et al. 2024. "Press ECCS to Doubt (Your Causal Graph)."
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Techniques from the theory of causality have seen extensive use in natural and social sciences, since they allow scientists to explicitly model assumptions and draw quantitative causal conclusions. More recently, causality has also gathered interest in many computer science sub-fields, including machine learning and systems. A causal model is usually represented as a causal graph, often automatically discovered from available data. For problems for which running a full constraint-based causal discovery algorithm and correctly orienting all edges is computationally intractable, automatically generated causal graphs are prone to error, calling for expensive manual graph verification. Understanding which parts of a causal graph have the largest impact on downstream results is essential for expediting this graph verification process. In this work, we present ECCS – a framework for Exposing Critical Causal Structures within a causal graph, with respect to a given Average Treatment Effect (ATE) calculation. We formalize the Interactive Causal Graph Verification problem, in which user judgments about edges in the causal graph are solicited sequentially, with the goal of minimizing the absolute error in the ATE of interest (without advance access to its ground-truth value). We present three algorithms to solve this problem. Based on a preliminary evaluation, our best-performing algorithm, AdjSetEdit, can solicit a sequence of 10 user judgments that outperforms a randomized such sequence by more than 60%, with time complexity linear in the number of data points and polynomial in the number of variables.
Description
GUIDE-AI ’24, June 09–15, 2024, Santiago, AA, Chile
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155539
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1145/3665601.3669842
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.