Adding a Third Wh-Phrase Does Not Increase the Acceptability of Object-Initial Multiple-Wh-Questions
Name
Fedorenko & Gibson Syntax in press.pdf
Size
195.94 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
e57ab59cc444981e18b4e961f8636b1a
Author(s)
Fedorenko, Evelina G.
Gibson, Edward A.
Date Issued
April 2010
Journal
Syntax
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Citation
Fedorenko, Evelina, and Edward Gibson. “Adding a Third Wh-phrase Does Not Increase the Acceptability of Object-initial Multiple-wh-questions.” Syntax 13.3 (2010) : 183-195.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
This paper quantitatively evaluates the empirical claim that adding a third wh-phrase to object-initial multiple-wh-questions increases their acceptability (e.g., Bolinger 1978, Kayne 1983)—a claim that posed a problem for accounts of the subject/object asymmetry in multiple-wh-questions (e.g., Chomsky 1973, 1993; Lasnik & Saito 1984; Pesetsky 1987, 2000; Richards 2001). Recently, Clifton et al. (2006) evaluated this claim using quantitative methods and failed to find support for it. However, a potential concern with Clifton et al.’s results was insufficient power to detect the effect of the third wh-phrase, possibly because of variance associated with several potential interpretations of multiple-wh-questions in null contexts. The goal of this paper is to extend the findings of Clifton et al. to cases where the critical sentences are presented in supportive contexts, so that the pair-list reading—the reading that has been argued to result in Superiority effects—is unambiguously supported. The results of the current study were similar to those of Clifton et al. and therefore provide further evidence against the claim that adding a third wh-phrase to object-initial multiple-wh-questions increases their acceptability.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00138.x
