Lexical-Semantic Content, Not Syntactic Structure, Is the Main Contributor to ANN-Brain Similarity of fMRI Responses in the Language Network
Name
nol_a_00116.pdf
Size
2.84 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
93d3293edfb64d493ee71e4d6eacb8e9
Author(s) • • • •
Kauf, Carina
Tuckute, Greta
Levy, Roger
Andreas, Jacob
Fedorenko, Evelina
Date Issued
September 21, 2023
Journal
Neurobiology of Language
Publisher
MIT Press
Citation
Kauf, C., Tuckute, G., Levy, R., Andreas, J., & Fedorenko, E. (2023).Lexical-semantic content, not syntactic
structure, is the main contributor to ANN-brain similarity of fMRI responses in the language network. Neurobiology of Language. Advance publication.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Representations from artificial neural network (ANN) language models have been shown to predict human brain activity in the language network. To understand what aspects of linguistic stimuli contribute to ANN-to-brain similarity, we used an fMRI data set of responses to n = 627 naturalistic English sentences (Pereira et al., 2018) and systematically manipulated the stimuli for which ANN representations were extracted. In particular, we (i) perturbed sentences’ word order, (ii) removed different subsets of words, or (iii) replaced sentences with other sentences of varying semantic similarity. We found that the lexical-semantic content of the sentence (largely carried by content words) rather than the sentence’s syntactic form (conveyed via word order or function words) is primarily responsible for the ANN-to-brain similarity. In follow-up analyses, we found that perturbation manipulations that adversely affect brain predictivity also lead to more divergent representations in the ANN’s embedding space and decrease the ANN’s ability to predict upcoming tokens in those stimuli. Further, results are robust as to whether the mapping model is trained on intact or perturbed stimuli and whether the ANN sentence representations are conditioned on the same linguistic context that humans saw. The critical result—that lexical-semantic content is the main contributor to the similarity between ANN representations and neural ones—aligns with the idea that the goal of the human language system is to extract meaning from linguistic strings. Finally, this work highlights the strength of systematic experimental manipulations for evaluating how close we are to accurate and generalizable models of the human language network.
Subjects
Neurology
Linguistics and Language
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00116