From Metaphors to Mechanisms: Gender Sorting in(to) an Organizational Hierarchy
Name
Fernandez_From metaphors.pdf
Size
380.87 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
572413e29976774aff76f15201b6d197
Author(s) •
Fernandez, Roberto
Abraham, Mabel Lana Botelho
Alternative Title
From Metaphors to Mechanisms: Gender Sorting Into an Organizational Hierarchy
Date Issued
August 2010
Journal
Proceedings of the ASA 2010 Annual Meeting
Publisher
American Sociological Association
Citation
Fernandez, Roberto M. and Mabel Botelho Abraham. "From Metaphors to Mechanisms: Gender Sorting in(to) an Organizational Hierarchy." ASA 2010 105th Annual Meeting, Aug. 14-17, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Version
Original manuscript
Abstract
Numerous studies have examined patterns of gender in equality in organizational advancement, with some showing results indicative of “glass ceilings,” where gender disparities are strong at the upper reaches of the organization, while others suggest “sticky floors,” where the gender differences in advancement occur at the lower levels of the organization. These studies, however, have been less clear on the mechanisms that produce these descriptive patterns. With few exceptions, extant studies have focused on internal promotion practices and have not addressed the extent to which these patterns might reflect gender differences in external recruitment and hiring into the organization. We construct queues consisting of both external and internal candidates—the set of candidates under consideration—for over 2,200 job openings during a 27-month period for a large retail bank. We find that women are more likely than men to be hired, and that this pattern holds for jobs up and down the organizational hierarchy. The applicant pools are themselves gendered, however, with women comprising a lower percentage of the applicant pools for high-level jobs, but a greater proportion of the pools for lower-level jobs. Since women are more likely than men to advance from each applicant pool to hire at all levels of the hierarchy, the apparent “glass ceiling” observed among job incumbents is not due to gendered screening practices. Instead, the roots of gender inequality in this firm lie in the initial sorting of applicants into queues.
MIT Department
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
http://convention2.allacademic.com/one/asa/asa10/