Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Why random reshuffling beats stochastic gradient descent

Why random reshuffling beats stochastic gradient descent

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

10107_2019_1440_ReferencePDF.pdf

Size

793.13 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

d712c969fe9c914795f1f6f1d5f58580

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
art_4706218038799521504.zip (696.84 KB)
Author(s)
Gürbüzbalaban, M.
•
Ozdaglar, A.
•
Parrilo, P. A
Date Issued
October 29, 2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Abstract We analyze the convergence rate of the random reshuffling (RR) method, which is a randomized first-order incremental algorithm for minimizing a finite sum of convex component functions. RR proceeds in cycles, picking a uniformly random order (permutation) and processing the component functions one at a time according to this order, i.e., at each cycle, each component function is sampled without replacement from the collection. Though RR has been numerically observed to outperform its with-replacement counterpart stochastic gradient descent (SGD), characterization of its convergence rate has been a long standing open question. In this paper, we answer this question by providing various convergence rate results for RR and variants when the sum function is strongly convex. We first focus on quadratic component functions and show that the expected distance of the iterates generated by RR with stepsize $$\alpha _k=\varTheta (1/k^s)$$ α k = Θ ( 1 / k s ) for $$s\in (0,1]$$ s ∈ ( 0 , 1 ] converges to zero at rate $$\mathcal{O}(1/k^s)$$ O ( 1 / k s ) (with $$s=1$$ s = 1 requiring adjusting the stepsize to the strong convexity constant). Our main result shows that when the component functions are quadratics or smooth (with a Lipschitz assumption on the Hessian matrices), RR with iterate averaging and a diminishing stepsize $$\alpha _k=\varTheta (1/k^s)$$ α k = Θ ( 1 / k s ) for $$s\in (1/2,1)$$ s ∈ ( 1 / 2 , 1 ) converges at rate $$\varTheta (1/k^{2s})$$ Θ ( 1 / k 2 s ) with probability one in the suboptimality of the objective value, thus improving upon the $$\varOmega (1/k)$$ Ω ( 1 / k ) rate of SGD. Our analysis draws on the theory of Polyak–Ruppert averaging and relies on decoupling the dependent cycle gradient error into an independent term over cycles and another term dominated by $$\alpha _k^2$$ α k 2 . This allows us to apply law of large numbers to an appropriately weighted version of the cycle gradient errors, where the weights depend on the stepsize. We also provide high probability convergence rate estimates that shows decay rate of different terms and allows us to propose a modification of RR with convergence rate $$\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{k^2})$$ O ( 1 k 2 ) .
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/132030
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-019-01440-w
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.