Prioritizing Early Disease Intervention
Name
43441_2023_569_ReferencePDF.pdf
Size
340.15 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
144d75bf9e59a160438ad69c87359cb5
Author(s)
Caicedo, H. H.
Darrow, Jonathan J.
Caicedo, Julio C.
Pentland, Alex
Date Issued
September 5, 2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Citation
Caicedo, H. H., Darrow, Jonathan J., Caicedo, Julio C. and Pentland, Alex. 2023. "Prioritizing Early Disease Intervention."
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Abstract
Scholars and practitioners have described how investing in health care earlier rather than later can be beneficial, from how “biomarkers” offer promise for early disease detection to healthcare system “incentives” that can promote early preventive medicine. Work by health economists has also made clear that the “health capital” of an individual depreciates over time in the absence of investments in health. Yet, our current policy makers and healthcare system continue prioritizing care of late-stage complex symptomatic illness, often when cure is impossible and disease reversal is improbable, thus exacerbating public health burdens. Critically missing are predicates to address this challenge include the following: first, identifying and validating the specific set of presymptomatic biomarkers that will inform the most appropriate intervention timing for those medical conditions amenable to early intervention; second, shifting fundamental health economic incentives to influence the appropriate disease prevention market; and third, formulating and executing a viable economic framework of reimbursement. We examine these predicates and propose actionable policy recommendations that may help align stakeholder interests to improve public health.
MIT Department
MIT Connection Science (Research institute)
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00569-3
