Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Deterrence with Imperfect Attribution

Deterrence with Imperfect Attribution

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

deterrence May 2020.pdf

Description
Accepted version
Size

442.5 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

7dad7fd6265e66617a8d22f95e786563

sword-2021-04-06T14:17:23.original.xml (130 B)
Original SWORD entry document
Author(s)
Wolitzky, Alexander Greenberg
Date Issued
November 2020
Journal
American Political Science Review
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Citation
Baliga, Sandeep et al. “Deterrence with Imperfect Attribution.” American Political Science Review, 114, 4 (November 2020): 1155 - 1178 © 2020 The Author(s)
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Motivated by recent developments in cyberwarfare, we study deterrence in a world where at-tacks cannot be perfectly attributed to attackers. In the model, each ofnattackers may attackthe defender. The defender observes a noisy signal that probabilistically attributes the attack.The defender may retaliate against one or more attackers, and wants to retaliate against theguilty attacker only. We note an endogenous strategic complementarity among the attackers: ifone attacker becomes more aggressive, that attacker becomes more “suspect” and the other at-tackers become less suspect, which leads the other attackers to become more aggressive as well.Despite this complementarity, there is a unique equilibrium. We identify types of improvementsin attribution that strengthen deterrence—namely, improving attack detection independently ofany effect on the identifiability of the attacker, reducing false alarms, or replacing misidentifica-tion with non-detection. However, we show that other improvements in attribution can backfire,weakening deterrence—these include detecting more attacks where the attacker is difficult toidentify or pursuing too much certainty in attribution. Deterrence is improved if the defendercan commit to a retaliatory strategy in advance, but the defender should not always commit toretaliate more after every signal.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130440
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000362
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.