Evaluation of probabilistic underspecification as a method for incorporating uncertainty into comparative life cycle assessments
Name
836792554-MIT.pdf
Description
Full printable version
Size
18.72 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
ebce5d2f298b32e1ccf471076abc8525
Author(s)
Wildnauer, Margaret T. (Margaret Thea)
Advisor(s)
Randolph E. Kirchain and John A. Ochsendorf.
Date Issued
2012
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
Life cycle assessments are quickly becoming a crucial method through which the environmental impacts of products or processes are evaluated. A concern with current practice, however, is that the use of deterministic values for inputs and final results only represent a single scenario, not all possible values and outcomes, or even a real-world situation. By incorporating uncertainty, an LCA can account for inherent variation and the use of proxy data, both of which are common occurrences in LCA implementation. In a comparative LCA, this uncertainty allows a decision to be made between alternatives with a certain level of confidence. While uncertainty is necessary for credible results, its implementation can also be time consuming. As LCAs grow more common, methods of streamlining are being explored to reduce both the effort and cost. One such streamlining method that also incorporates uncertainty is probabilistic underspecification. This method evaluates environmental parameters by dividing them into different material and process categories. The lowest level of specification, Level 1, is defined by the type of material or process, such as metal or freight transportation. This category is then subdivided based on different characteristics of the material or process. The highest level of specification, Level 5, consists of the individual database processes used by traditional LCAs. This thesis compares the streamlining method of probabilistic underspecification to the more common method of incorporating uncertainty, termed here as individual probabilistic specification. A case study on alternative pavement designs is used to demonstrate and compare both the methodologies. The effort required for each methodology is compared by the percentage of processes specified at Level 5, which is 100% for individual probabilistic specification, but much less for probabilistic underspecification. The results of the case study showed that as little as 32% or less of the processes need to be specified at Level 5 in order to have the required level of confidence in the decision being made. It can be seen that, as a streamlining method to estimate the results of comparative LCAs, probabilistic underspecification is a viable option.
Description
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2012.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 97-100).
Subjects
Civil and Environmental Engineering.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Terms of Use
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
Persistent DSpace Link