Characterizing Uncertainty in Machine Learning for Chemistry
Name
heid-et-al-2023-characterizing-uncertainty-in-machine-learning-for-chemistry.pdf
Description
Published version
Size
3.71 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
1f3fd9f02f6e6834cb7143f6469b598c
Author(s) • • •
Heid, Esther
McGill, Charles J
Vermeire, Florence H
Green, William H
Date Issued
June 20, 2023
Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Publisher
American Chemical Society
Citation
Heid, Esther, McGill, Charles J, Vermeire, Florence H and Green, William H. 2023. "Characterizing Uncertainty in Machine Learning for Chemistry." Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 63 (13).
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Characterizing uncertainty in machine learning models has recently gained interest in the context of machine learning reliability, robustness, safety, and active learning. Here, we separate the total uncertainty into contributions from noise in the data (aleatoric) and shortcomings of the model (epistemic), further dividing epistemic uncertainty into model bias and variance contributions. We systematically address the influence of noise, model bias, and model variance in the context of chemical property predictions, where the diverse nature of target properties and the vast chemical chemical space give rise to many different distinct sources of prediction error. We demonstrate that different sources of error can each be significant in different contexts and must be individually addressed during model development. Through controlled experiments on data sets of molecular properties, we show important trends in model performance associated with the level of noise in the data set, size of the data set, model architecture, molecule representation, ensemble size, and data set splitting. In particular, we show that 1) noise in the test set can limit a model's observed performance when the actual performance is much better, 2) using size-extensive model aggregation structures is crucial for extensive property prediction, and 3) ensembling is a reliable tool for uncertainty quantification and improvement specifically for the contribution of model variance. We develop general guidelines on how to improve an underperforming model when falling into different uncertainty contexts.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00373