Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Shades of authoritarian digital sovereignty: divergences in Russian and Chinese data localisation regimes

Shades of authoritarian digital sovereignty: divergences in Russian and Chinese data localisation regimes

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Shades of authoritarian digital sovereignty divergences in Russian and Chinese data localisation regimes.pdf

Size

999.11 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

8d9b71bc576d1e21aa73304c5014e897

Author(s)
Khasanova, Liliya
•
Tai, Katharin
Date Issued
January 2, 2024
Journal
Journal of Cyber Policy
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Citation
Khasanova, L., & Tai, K. (2024). Shades of authoritarian digital sovereignty: divergences in Russian and Chinese data localisation regimes. Journal of Cyber Policy, 9(1), 70–94.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The concept of sovereignty is now referred to in cyberspace-related policy by a range of governments, both authoritarian and democratic. At the same time, the most prominent proponents of state – or sovereignty-centric models of internet governance are Russia and China, whose positions are often characterised as a shared ‘Sino-Russian’ model. This paper subjects this idea of a shared Sino-Russian approach to empirical scrutiny by conducting a comparative analysis of rules, regulations and policies on data localisation in both countries. By delimiting the research question to regulations on data localisation and cross-border data transfers in both countries, we identify an important set of similarities and differences between the Russian and Chinese approaches. They share some features associated with authoritarian regimes, such as uncertainty around the selective enforcement of broadly formulated rules and a centralised assessment of outbound data transfers. However, we also find significant differences in the level of institutional centralisation, degrees of responsiveness within the policymaking process, and economic logics driving data localisation and cross-border transfer regulations. Based on these findings, we argue that despite a perception that Russia and China adhere to a similar model of authoritarian digital sovereignty, there are significant disparities in their data localisation regimes.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/164795
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2024.2413938
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.