Self-efficacy and behavior patterns of learners using a real-time collaboration system developed for group programming
Name
11412_2021_Article_9357.pdf
Size
2.77 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
f7fc722fc5a436d403fd6678c96b1814
Author(s)
Hsu, Ting-Chia
Abelson, Harold
Patton, Evan
Chen, Shih-Chu
Chang, Hsuan-Ning
Date Issued
January 1, 2022
Publisher
Springer US
Citation
Hsu, Ting-Chia, Abelson, Hal, Patton, Evan, Chen, Shih-Chu and Chang, Hsuan-Ning. 2022. "Self-efficacy and behavior patterns of learners using a real-time collaboration system developed for group programming."
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Abstract
In order to promote the practice of co-creation, a real-time collaboration (RTC) version of the popular block-based programming (BBP) learning environment, MIT App Inventor (MAI), was proposed and implemented. RTC overcomes challenges related to non-collocated group work, thus lowering barriers to cross-region and multi-user collaborative software development. An empirical study probed into the differential impact on self-efficacy and collaborative behavior of learners in the environment depending upon their disciplinary background. The study serves as an example of the use of learning analytics to explore the frequent behavior patterns of adult learners, in this case specifically while performing BBP in MAI integrated with RTC. This study compares behavior patterns that are collaborative or individual that occurred on the platform, and investigates the effects of collaboration on learners working within the RTC depending on whether they were CS-majors or not. We highlight advantages of the new MAI design during multi-user programming in the online RTC based on the connections between the interface design and BBP as illustrated by two significant behavior patterns found in this instructional experiment. First, the multi-user programming in the RTC allowed multiple tasks to happen at the same time, which promoted engagement in joint behavior. For example, one user arranged components in the interface design while another dragged blocks to complete the program. Second, this study confirmed that the Computer Programming Self-Efficacy (CPSE) was similar for individual and multi-user programming overall. The CPSE of the homogeneous CS-major groups engaged in programming within the RTC was higher than that of the homogeneous non-CS-major groups and heterogeneous groups. There was no significant difference between the CPSE of the homogenous non-CS group and the CPSE of the heterogeneous groups, regardless of whether they were engaged in individual programming or collaborative programming within their groups. The results of the study support the value of engaging with MAI collaboratively, especially for CS-majors, and suggest directions for future work in RTC design.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09357-3
