Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning
Name
Frazzoli_Sampling-based algorithms.pdf
Size
9.51 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
cf08cf1d1544394f4ce03c850ecc77ce
Author(s) •
Karaman, Sertac
Frazzoli, Emilio
Date Issued
June 2011
Journal
The International Journal of Robotics Research
Publisher
Sage Publications
Citation
Karaman, S., and E. Frazzoli. “Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning.” The International Journal of Robotics Research 30, no. 7 (June 22, 2011): 846-894.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
During the last decade, sampling-based path planning algorithms, such as probabilistic roadmaps (PRM) and rapidly exploring random trees (RRT), have been shown to work well in practice and possess theoretical guarantees such as probabilistic completeness. However, little effort has been devoted to the formal analysis of the quality of the solution returned by such algorithms, e.g. as a function of the number of samples. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap, by rigorously analyzing the asymptotic behavior of the cost of the solution returned by stochastic sampling-based algorithms as the number of samples increases. A number of negative results are provided, characterizing existing algorithms, e.g. showing that, under mild technical conditions, the cost of the solution returned by broadly used sampling-based algorithms converges almost surely to a non-optimal value. The main contribution of the paper is the introduction of new algorithms, namely, PRM* and RRT*, which are provably asymptotically optimal, i.e. such that the cost of the returned solution converges almost surely to the optimum. Moreover, it is shown that the computational complexity of the new algorithms is within a constant factor of that of their probabilistically complete (but not asymptotically optimal) counterparts. The analysis in this paper hinges on novel connections between stochastic sampling-based path planning algorithms and the theory of random geometric graphs.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364911406761