Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. "My Very Subjective Human Interpretation": Domain Expert Perspectives on Navigating the Text Analysis Loop for Topic Models

"My Very Subjective Human Interpretation": Domain Expert Perspectives on Navigating the Text Analysis Loop for Topic Models

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

3701201.pdf

Size

723.16 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

dd7d88e991539f83be2e1caa055636db

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
3701201.zip (700.18 KB)
Author(s)
Schofield, Alexandra
•
Wu, Siqi
•
Bayard de Volo, Theo
•
Kuze, Tatsuki
•
Gomez, Alfredo
•
Sultana, Sharifa
Date Issued
January 10, 2025
Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
Citation
Schofield, Alexandra, Wu, Siqi, Bayard de Volo, Theo, Kuze, Tatsuki, Gomez, Alfredo et al. 2025. ""My Very Subjective Human Interpretation": Domain Expert Perspectives on Navigating the Text Analysis Loop for Topic Models." Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9 (GROUP).
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Practitioners dealing with large text collections frequently use topic models such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) in their projects to explore trends. Despite twenty years of accrued advancement in natural language processing tools, these models are found to be slow and challenging to apply to text exploration projects. In our work, we engaged with practitioners (n=15) who use topic modeling to explore trends in large text collections to understand their project workflows and investigate which factors often slow down the processes and how they deal with such errors and interruptions in automated topic modeling. Our findings show that practitioners are required to diagnose and resolve context-specific problems with preparing data and models and need control for these steps, especially for data cleaning and parameter selection. Our major findings resonate with existing work across CSCW, computational social science, machine learning, data science, and digital humanities. They also leave us questioning whether automation is actually a useful goal for tools designed for topic models and text exploration.
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/158190
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1145/3701201
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.