Asteroid deflection campaign design integrating epistemic uncertainty
Name
962368169-MIT.pdf
Description
Full printable version
Size
34.27 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
296f764d96bd3fc4bb1a6ce7cb7a6905
Author(s)
Paek, Sung Wook
Advisor(s)
Olivier L. de Weck, David W. Miller, Jeffrey A. Hoffman and Richard P. Binzel.
Date Issued
2016
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
Planetary defense, or asteroid collision avoidance, has been gaining interest with recent meteor or fly-by events, including the Chelyabinsk meteor that entered the Earth's atmosphere and exploded over Russia in 2013. Past or planned robotic missions to near-Earth asteroids are expected to provide an excellent opportunity to demonstrate asteroid deflection techniques. However, applying a deflection technique to a hazardous asteroid in real-world situations requires extreme care for decision makers due to inherent uncertainty. The forms of uncertainty can be epistemic or aleatoric. Epistemic uncertainty can be reduced by replenishing incomplete information with better observations, whereas stochastic uncertainty cannot be reduced owing to its randomness. Although we cannot reduce stochastic uncertainty itself, we can come up with a plan which is robust to random uncertainty, by reducing epistemic uncertainty. This thesis develops a methodology to design an asteroid deflection campaign that consists of multiple mission stages. The first stage serves as a precursor whose type can achieve different amounts of uncertainty reduction. With this in-situ information obtained by precursors, the follow-up stage may adapt its impactor design. The methodology is implemented in the Asteroid Deflection Integrating Epistemic Uncertainty (ADIEU) framework. The ADIEU framework is demonstrated in deflection campaigns of select near- Earth asteroids. Generation of campaign solutions over a 15-year period, with different confidence requirements, requires up to 125,000 full-factorial runs and 400 optimization runs per asteroid. Results show that campaigns which consider and reduce epistemic uncertainty can both decrease launch mass and increase robustness. However, there are also cases, under extreme conditions, where a single-stage mission turns out to perform best. The performance envelopes of these different approaches are superposed to generate a decision map for use as a visual aid. Finally, this thesis concludes by outlining future work to refine the framework, as well as potential uses of the methodology in terrestrial applications.
Description
Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 241-249).
Subjects
Aeronautics and Astronautics.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Terms of Use
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
Persistent DSpace Link
