Significant Excess of Electronlike Events in the MiniBooNE Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiment
Name
PhysRevLett.121.221801.pdf
Size
1.12 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
56a2e50ef99847e12f8b98eb92255dc0
Author(s)
Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A.
Brown, B. C.
Cheng, G.
Cooper, R. L.
Dharmapalan, R.
Djurcic, Z.
Finley, D. A.
Ford, R.
Garcia, F. G.
Garvey, G. T.
Date Issued
November 2018
Journal
Physical Review Letters
Publisher
American Physical Society
Citation
Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A. et al. "Significant Excess of Electronlike Events in the MiniBooNE Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiment." Physical Review Letters 121, 22 (November 2018): 221801
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of ν[subscript e] appearance data from 12.84 × 10²⁰ protons on target in neutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of 2 over previously reported results. A ν[subscript e] charged-current quasielastic event excess of 381.2 ± 85.2 events (4.5σ) is observed in the energy range 200 < E[subscript ν][superscript QE] < 1250 MeV. Combining these data with the ν[over ¯][subscript e] appearance data from 11.27×10²⁰ protons on target in antineutrino mode, a total ν[subscript e] plus ν[over ¯][subscript e] charged-current quasielastic event excess of 460.5 ± 99.0 events (4.7σ) is observed. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscillation model, ν[subscript μ]→ν[subscript e], the best oscillation fit to the excess has a probability of 21.1%, while the background-only fit has a χ² probability of 6×10⁻⁷ relative to the best fit. The MiniBooNE data are consistent in energy and magnitude with the excess of events reported by the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND), and the significance of the combined LSND and MiniBooNE excesses is 6.0σ. A two-neutrino oscillation interpretation of the data would require at least four neutrino types and indicate physics beyond the three neutrino paradigm. Although the data are fit with a two-neutrino oscillation model, other models may provide better fits to the data.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Nuclear Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.221801
