Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. The Sandia Fracture Challenge: blind round robin predictions of ductile tearing

The Sandia Fracture Challenge: blind round robin predictions of ductile tearing

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

10704_2013_Article_9904.pdf

Size

12.87 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

efe618ca1895592305f2c61f1ccdd08f

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
art_8664119789475682724.zip (11.22 MB)
Author(s)
Boyce, B. L
•
Kramer, S. L B
•
Fang, H. E
•
Cordova, T. E
•
Neilsen, M. K
•
Dion, K.
•
Kaczmarowski, A. K
•
Karasz, E.
•
Xue, L.
•
Gross, A. J
more
Date Issued
January 2014
Journal
International Journal of Fracture
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Citation
Boyce, B. L.; Kramer, S. L. B.; Fang, H. E. et al. “The Sandia Fracture Challenge: Blind Round Robin Predictions of Ductile Tearing.” International Journal of Fracture 186, no. 1–2 (January 2014): 5–68 © 2014 The Author(s) 2014
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Existing and emerging methods in computational mechanics are rarely validated against problems with an unknown outcome. For this reason, Sandia National Laboratories, in partnership with US National Science Foundation and Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, launched a computational challenge in mid-summer, 2012. Researchers and engineers were invited to predict crack initiation and propagation in a simple but novel geometry fabricated from a common off-the-shelf commercial engineering alloy. The goal of this international Sandia Fracture Challenge was to benchmark the capabilities for the prediction of deformation and damage evolution associated with ductile tearing in structural metals, including physics models, computational methods, and numerical implementations currently available in the computational fracture community. Thirteen teams participated, reporting blind predictions for the outcome of the Challenge. The simulations and experiments were performed independently and kept confidential. The methods for fracture prediction taken by the thirteen teams ranged from very simple engineering calculations to complicated multiscale simulations. The wide variation in modeling results showed a striking lack of consistency across research groups in addressing problems of ductile fracture. While some methods were more successful than others, it is clear that the problem of ductile fracture prediction continues to be challenging. Specific areas of deficiency have been identified through this effort. Also, the effort has underscored the need for additional blind prediction-based assessments.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110644
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9904-6
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.