Biogeochemical controls and isotopic signatures of nitrous oxide production by a marine ammonia-oxidizing bacterium
Name
Frame-2010-Biogeochemical controls and isotopic signatures of nitrous oxide.pdf
Size
665.01 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
22d6960dc3c5f9cec4806a535ea9e7c7
Author(s) •
Frame, Caitlin H.
Casciotti, K. L.
Date Issued
September 2010
Journal
Biogeosciences
Publisher
European Geosciences Union / Copernicus
Citation
Frame, C. H., and K. L. Casciotti. “Biogeochemical Controls and Isotopic Signatures of Nitrous Oxide Production by a Marine Ammonia-oxidizing Bacterium.” Biogeosciences 7.9 (2010) : 2695-2709. © Author(s) 2010
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Nitrous oxide (N2O)[N subscript 2 O] is a trace gas that contributes to the greenhouse effect and stratospheric ozone depletion. The N2O [N subscript 2 O] yield from nitrification (moles N2O-N [N subscript 2 O - N] produced per mole ammonium-N consumed) has been used to estimate marine N2O [N subscript 2 O] production rates from measured nitrification rates and global estimates of oceanic export production. However, the N2O [N subscript 2 O] yield from nitrification is not constant. Previous culture-based measurements indicate that N2O [N subscript 2 O] yield increases as oxygen (O2) [O subscript 2] concentration decreases and as nitrite (NO2−) [NO subscript 2 overscore] concentration increases. Here, we have measured yields of N2O [N subscript 2 O] from cultures of the marine β-proteobacterium [beta-proteobacterium] Nitrosomonas marina C-113a as they grew on low-ammonium (50 μM)[50 mu M] media. These yields, which were typically between 4 × 10−4 [10 superscript -4] and 7 × 10−4 [10 superscript -4] for cultures with cell densities between 2 × 102 [10 super script 2] and 2.1 × 104 [10 superscript 4] cells ml−1 [ml superscript -1], were lower than previous reports for ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. The observed impact of O2 [O subscript 2] concentration on yield was also smaller than previously reported under all conditions except at high starting cell densities (1.5 × 106 cells ml−1) [1.5 x 10 superscript 6 cells ml superscript -1], where 160-fold higher yields were observed at 0.5% O2 [O subscript 2](5.1 μM [mu M] dissolved O2 [O subscript 2]) compared with 20% O2 [O subscript 2] (203 μM [mu M] dissolved O2 O subscript 2]). At lower cell densities (2 × 102 [10 superscript 2] and 2.1 × 104 [10 superscript 4] cells ml−1 [ml superscript -1]), cultures grown under 0.5% O2 [O subscript 2] had yields that were only 1.25- to 1.73-fold higher than cultures grown under 20% O2 [O subscript 2]. Thus, previously reported many-fold increases in N2O [N subscript 2 O] yield with dropping O2 [O subscript 2] could be reproduced only at cell densities that far exceeded those of ammonia oxidizers in the ocean. The presence of excess NO2− [NO subscript 2 overscore] (up to 1 mM) in the growth medium also increased N2O [N subscript 2 O] yields by an average of 70% to 87% depending on O2 [O subscript 2] concentration. We made stable isotopic measurements on N2O [N subscript 2 O] from these cultures to identify the biochemical mechanisms behind variations in N2O [N subscript 2 O] yield. Based on measurements of δ15Nbulk [delta superscript 15 N superscript bulk], site preference (SP = δ15Nα−δ15Nβ [delta superscript 15 N superscript alpha - delta superscript 15 N superscript beta]), and δ18O [delta superscript 18 O] of N2O [N subscript 2 O] (δ18O-N2O [delta superscript 18 O - N subscript 2 O]), we estimate that nitrifier-denitrification produced between 11% and 26% of N2O [N subscript 2 O] from cultures grown under 20% O2 [O subscript 2] and 43% to 87% under 0.5% O2 [O subscript 2]. We also demonstrate that a positive correlation between SP and δ18O-N2O [delta superscript 18 O - N subscript 2 O] is expected when nitrifying bacteria produce N2O [N subscript 2 O]. A positive relationship between SP and δ18O-N2O [delta superscript 18 O - N subscript 2 O] has been observed in environmental N2O [N subscript 2 O] datasets, but until now, explanations for the observation invoked only denitrification. Such interpretations may overestimate the role of heterotrophic denitrification and underestimate the role of ammonia oxidation in environmental N2O [N subscript 2 O] production.
MIT Department
Joint Program in Chemical Oceanography
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sea Grant College Program
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2695-2010