Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society
  3. Connection Science
  4. Winning Models for Grade Point Average, Grit, and Layoff in the Fragile Families Challenge

Winning Models for Grade Point Average, Grit, and Layoff in the Fragile Families Challenge

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Winning Models for Grade Point Average, Grit, and Layoff in the Fragile Families Challenge .pdf

Size

967.44 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

43d77d9bc331f158fbe01882291212b4

Author(s)
Rigobon, Daniel E.
•
Jahani, Eaman
•
Suhara, Yoshihiko
•
AlGhoneim, Khaled
•
Alghunaim, Abdulaziz
•
Pentland, Alex
•
Almaatouq, Abdullah
Date Issued
September 10, 2019
Publisher
Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
Citation
Rigobon, D. E., Jahani, E., Suhara, Y., AlGhoneim, K., Alghunaim, A., Pentland, A. S., & Almaatouq, A. (2019). Winning Models for Grade Point Average, Grit, and Layoff in the Fragile Families Challenge. Socius, 5, 2378023118820418.
Abstract
In this article, the authors discuss and analyze their approach to the Fragile Families Challenge. The data consisted of more than 12,000 features (covariates) about the children and their parents, schools, and overall environments from birth to age 9. The authors’ modular and collaborative approach parallelized prediction tasks and relied primarily on existing data science techniques, including (1) data preprocessing: elimination of low variance features, imputation of missing data, and construction of composite features; (2) feature selection through univariate mutual information and extraction of nonzero least absolute shrinkage and selection operator coefficients; (3) three machine learning models: random forest, elastic net, and gradient-boosted trees; and finally (4) prediction aggregation according to performance. The top-performing submissions produced winning out-of-sample predictions for three outcomes: grade point average, grit, and layoff. However, predictions were at most 20 percent better than a baseline that predicted the mean value of the training data for each outcome.
MIT Department
MIT Connection Science (Research institute)
Terms of Use
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130263
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.