Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  3. Artificial Intelligence Lab Publications
  4. AI Technical Reports (1964 - 2004)
  5. Representing and Reasoning About Change in Geologic Interpretation

Representing and Reasoning About Change in Geologic Interpretation

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

AITR-749.pdf

Size

6.71 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

6b66708c68395ff70dc216cd860a583d

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

AITR-749.ps

Size

9.5 MB

Format

PostScript

Checksum (MD5)

84be3b1e3f3e946a84ca6c6fc1fa80e1

Author(s)
Simmons, Reid Gordon
Date Issued
December 1, 1983
Series/Report no.
AITR-749
Abstract
Geologic interpretation is the task of inferring a sequence of events to explain how a given geologic region could have been formed. This report describes the design and implementation of one part of a geologic interpretation problem solver -- a system which uses a simulation technique called imagining to check the validity of a candidate sequence of events. Imagining uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative simulations to reason about the changes which occured to the geologic region. The spatial changes which occur are simulated by constructing a sequence of diagrams. The quantitative simulation needs numeric parameters which are determined by using the qualitative simulation to establish the cumulative changes to an object and by using a description of the current geologic region to make quantitative measurements. The diversity of reasoning skills used in imagining has necessitated the development of multiple representations, each specialized for a different task. Representations to facilitate doing temporal, spatial and numeric reasoning are described in detail. We have also found it useful to explicitly represent processes. Both the qualitative and quantitative simulations use a discrete 'layer cake' model of geologic processes, but each uses a separate representation, specialized to support the type of simulation. These multiple representations have enabled us to develop a powerful, yet modular, system for reasoning about change.
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6868
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.