Covariant phase space with boundaries
Name
13130_2020_Article_14048.pdf
Size
691.1 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
8a7ac921f6ec3ad45a2d3b1aa4111c91
Author(s)
Harlow, Daniel L.
Wu, Jie-qiang
Date Issued
October 2020
Journal
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Citation
Harlow, Daniel and Wu, Jie-qiang. “Covariant phase space with boundaries.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2020 (October 2020): 146. © 2020 The Author(s)
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The covariant phase space method of Iyer, Lee, Wald, and Zoupas gives an elegant way to understand the Hamiltonian dynamics of Lagrangian field theories without breaking covariance. The original literature however does not systematically treat total derivatives and boundary terms, which has led to some confusion about how exactly to apply the formalism in the presence of boundaries. In particular the original construction of the canonical Hamiltonian relies on the assumed existence of a certain boundary quantity “B”, whose physical interpretation has not been clear. We here give an algorithmic procedure for applying the covariant phase space formalism to field theories with spatial boundaries, from which the term in the Hamiltonian involving B emerges naturally. Our procedure also produces an additional boundary term, which was not present in the original literature and which so far has only appeared implicitly in specific examples, and which is already nonvanishing even in general relativity with sufficiently permissive boundary conditions. The only requirement we impose is that at solutions of the equations of motion the action is stationary modulo future/past boundary terms under arbitrary variations obeying the spatial boundary conditions; from this the symplectic structure and the Hamiltonian for any diffeomorphism that preserves the theory are unambiguously constructed. We show in examples that the Hamiltonian so constructed agrees with previous results. We also show that the Poisson bracket on covariant phase space directly coincides with the Peierls bracket, without any need for non-covariant intermediate steps, and we discuss possible implications for the entropy of dynamical black hole horizons.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)146
