Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Libraries
  3. MIT Theses
  4. Graduate Theses
  5. Approximate nearest neighbor problem in high dimensions

Approximate nearest neighbor problem in high dimensions

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

62221782-MIT.pdf

Description
Full printable version
Size

2.25 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

2c1e70a09d0cc33cca2f48c0511b4cb7

Author(s)
Andoni, Alexandr
Advisor(s)
Piotr Indyk.
Date Issued
2005
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
We investigate the problem of finding the approximate nearest neighbor when the data set points are the substrings of a given text T. The exact version of this problem is defined as follows. Given a text T of length n, we want to build a data structure that supports the following operation: given a pattern P, find the substring of T that is the closest to P. Since the exact version of this problem is surprisingly difficult, we address the approximate version, in which we are allowed to return a substring of T that is at most c times further than the actual closest substring of T. This problem occurs, for example, in computational biology [4, 5]. In particular, we study the case where the length of the pattern P, denoted by m, is not known in advance, which is the most natural scenario. We present a data structure that uses O(n1+1/c) space and has 0 (nl/c + mn⁰(l)) query time' when the distance between two strings is the Hamming distance. These bounds essentially match the earlier bounds of [12], which assumed that the pattern length m is fixed in advance. Furthermore, our data structure can be constructed in O (n1+1/c + n1+⁰(1)M1/3) time, where M is an upper bound for m. This time essentially matches the preprocessing time of [12] as long as the term O(n1+1/c) dominates the running time, which is the case when, for example, c < 3. We also extend our results to the case where the distances are measured according to the lI distance. The query time and the space bound are essentially the same, while the preprocessing time becomes 6 (n'+/c + nl+o(l)M2/3) (We use notation f(n) = O(g(n)) to denote f(n) = g(n) logO(1) g(n)).
Description
Thesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2005.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 47-49).
Subjects
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Terms of Use
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33106
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.