Space‐Based Constraints on Terrestrial Glyoxal Production
Name
4d8c64_caa001807a8b4788a13953189ea1c5ca.pdf
Description
Published version
Size
4.12 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
6fffb8d3cefd9ddeb35fc327320ce816
Author(s)
Silva, Sam James
Heald, Colette L.
Li, Meng
Date Issued
November 2018
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Citation
Silva, Sam J. et. al., "Space‐Based Constraints on Terrestrial Glyoxal Production." Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 123, 23 (December 2018): 13,583-94 doi. 10.1029/2018JD029311 ©2018 Authors
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Glyoxal is a volatile organic compound (VOC) in the atmosphere that is a precursor to ozone and secondary organic aerosol, can be a measure of photochemical activity, and is one of a small number of VOCs observable from space. However, the global budget of glyoxal is not well understood, and there has been limited exploration of whether current chemical transport models reproduce satellite observations of this VOC. In this work we take advantage of recent advances in the retrieval of glyoxal from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument along with retrieved formaldehyde and the GEOS-Chem model to constrain global glyoxal sources. Model glyoxal is produced by direct emissions from fires (6.5 Tg/year) and secondary chemical production (32.9 Tg/year) from biogenic and anthropogenic precursors. The model reproduces the annual average terrestrial spatial variability in formaldehyde and glyoxal reasonably well, with an R2 of 0.8 and 0.5, respectively. We find that the model representation of biomass burning, C2H2, glyocolaldehyde, and isoprene-dominated glyoxal production is consistent with the observations of glyoxal and formaldehyde, and the ratio of glyoxal to formaldehyde to within ~20%. However, the observations suggest that glyoxal production from the high monoterpene-emitting boreal regions is underestimated in the model, with concentrations low by more than a factor of 3. This suggests that the oxidative chemistry of monoterpenes is not well represented in the GEOS-Chem model and that more laboratory work is needed to constrain the impact of monoterpene emissions on atmospheric composition. ©2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029311
