Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Embedding human knowledge in material screening pipeline as filters to identify novel synthesizable inorganic materials

Embedding human knowledge in material screening pipeline as filters to identify novel synthesizable inorganic materials

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

d4fd00120f.pdf

Description
Published version
Size

643.31 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

a054415b8e597e2620d73b034857c430

sword-2024-11-01T17:08:09.original.xml (130 B)
Original SWORD entry document
Author(s)
Das, Basita
•
Ji, Kangyu
•
Sheng, Fang
•
McCall, Kyle M
•
Buonassisi, Tonio
Date Issued
October 8, 2024
Journal
Faraday Discussions
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry
Citation
Das, Basita, Ji, Kangyu, Sheng, Fang, McCall, Kyle M and Buonassisi, Tonio. 2024. "Embedding human knowledge in material screening pipeline as filters to identify novel synthesizable inorganic materials." Faraday Discussions.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
How might one embed a chemist's knowledge into an automated materials-discovery pipeline? In generative design for inorganic crystalline materials, generating candidate compounds is no longer a bottleneck – there are now synthetic datasets of millions of compounds. However, weeding out unsynthesizable or difficult to synthesize compounds remains an outstanding challenge. Post-generation “filters” have been proposed as a means of embedding human domain knowledge, either in the form of scientific laws or rules of thumb. Examples include charge neutrality, electronegativity balance, and energy above hull. Some filters are “hard” and some are “soft” — for example, it is difficult to envision creating a stable compound while violating the rule of charge neutrality; however, several compounds break the Hume-Rothery rules. It is therefore natural to wonder: can one compile a comprehensive list of “filters” that embed domain knowledge, adopt a principled approach to classifying them as either non-conditional or conditional “filters,” and envision a software environment to implement combinations of these in a systematic manner? In this commentary we explore such questions, “filters” for screening of novel inorganic compounds for synthesizability.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/157460
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1039/d4fd00120f
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.