Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Leakage-resilient coin tossing

Leakage-resilient coin tossing

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Goldwasser_Leakage-resilient.pdf

Size

482.74 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

60bf974fb4118f6d9126ac0ed662021c

Author(s)
Boyle, Elette
•
Goldwasser, Shafi
Date Issued
January 2011
Journal
Distributed Computing
Publisher
Spring Berlin/Heidelberg
Citation
Boyle, Elette, Shafi Goldwasser, and Yael Tauman Kalai. “Leakage-Resilient Coin Tossing.” Distributed Computing. Ed. David Peleg. Vol. 6950. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. 181-196. © 2011 Springer
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The ability to collectively toss a common coin among n parties in the presence of faults is an important primitive in the arsenal of randomized distributed protocols. In the case of dishonest majority, it was shown to be impossible to achieve less than 1 r bias in O(r) rounds (Cleve STOC ’86). In the case of honest majority, in contrast, unconditionally secure O(1)-round protocols for generating common unbiased coins follow from general completeness theorems on multi-party secure protocols in the secure channels model (e.g., BGW, CCD STOC ’88). However, in the O(1)-round protocols with honest majority, parties generate and hold secret values which are assumed to be perfectly hidden from malicious parties: an assumption which is crucial to proving the resulting common coin is unbiased. This assumption unfortunately does not seem to hold in practice, as attackers can launch side-channel attacks on the local state of honest parties and leak information on their secrets. In this work, we present an O(1)-round protocol for collectively generating an unbiased common coin, in the presence of leakage on the local state of the honest parties. We tolerate t ≤ ( 1 3 − )n computationallyunbounded Byzantine faults and in addition a Ω(1)-fraction leakage on each (honest) party’s secret state. Our results hold in the memory leakage model (of Akavia, Goldwasser, Vaikuntanathan ’08) adapted to the distributed setting. Additional contributions of our work are the tools we introduce to achieve the collective coin toss: a procedure for disjoint committee election, and leakage-resilient verifiable secret sharing.
Description
Proceedings 25th International Symposium, DISC 2011, Rome, Italy, September 20-22, 2011.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/71675
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24100-0_16
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.