Trade Policy
Name
89 ashford letter ISSUES.pdf
Size
187.04 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
052f9c2e3c6df8516673b7528c39ea4e
Author(s)
Ashford, Nicholas A.
Date Issued
2014
Citation
Science and Technology
Abstract
In an otherwise insightful and thoughtful article, Sebastian Pfotenhauer (Trade Policy Is Science Policy,” Issues, Fall 2013) might better have entitled his contribution “Trade Policy Needs to Be Reconciled with Science Policy.” The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the agreements administered by the World Trade Organization, particularly the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), were adopted to promote international trade and increase the economic benefits therefrom. Harmonization of environmental, health, and safety, and (EHS) standards and practices was generally not the goal of these agreements, except perhaps for the TBT agreement, which was predicated on EHS standards being based on “strong science” that could result in uniformity dictated by rigorous scientific consensus focused on risk assessments.
Description
Letter to the Editor
Terms of Use
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Persistent DSpace Link
