Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses

Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

nihms-608008.pdf

Size

1.6 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

75f41326c531e681df0434bd4ddf4158

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
sword-2017-11-20.original.zip (1.45 MB)
Author(s)
Cikara, M.
•
Van Bavel, J.J.
•
Bruneau, Emile Gabriel
•
Saxe, Rebecca R
Date Issued
June 2014
Journal
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Cikara, M. et al. “Their Pain Gives Us Pleasure: How Intergroup Dynamics Shape Empathic Failures and Counter-Empathic Responses.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55 (November 2014): 110–125 © 2014 Elsevier Inc
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Despite its early origins and adaptive functions, empathy is not inevitable; people routinely fail to empathize with others, especially members of different social or cultural groups. In five experiments, we systematically explore how social identity, functional relations between groups, competitive threat, and perceived entitativity contribute to intergroup empathy bias: the tendency not only to empathize less with out-group relative to in-group members, but also to feel pleasure in response to their pain (and pain in response to their pleasure). When teams are set in direct competition, affective responses to competition-irrelevant events are characterized not only by less empathy toward out-group relative to in-group members, but also by increased counter-empathic responses: Schadenfreude and Glückschmerz (Experiment 1). Comparing responses to in-group and out-group targets against responses to unaffiliated targets in this competitive context suggests that intergroup empathy bias may be better characterized by out-group antipathy rather than extraordinary in-group empathy (Experiment 2). We also find that intergroup empathy bias is robust to changes in relative group standing-feedback indicating that the out-group has fallen behind (Experiment 3a) or is no longer a competitive threat (Experiment 3b) does not reduce the bias. However, reducing perceived in-group and out-group entitativity can significantly attenuate intergroup empathy bias (Experiment 4). This research establishes the boundary conditions of intergroup empathy bias and provides initial support for a more integrative framework of group-based empathy.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/112314
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JESP.2014.06.007
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.