The tools we use : a study of user preferences for sketches, prototypes, and CAD models and the influence on design outcome
Name
970393674-MIT.pdf
Description
Full printable version
Size
10.75 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
cf9efec4e7a5b9e01a1a2952e8f802d0
Author(s)
Tsai, Geoffrey T
Advisor(s)
Maria C. Yang.
Date Issued
2016
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
During a product design and development process, design teams use a variety of tools to generate and represent multiple design options before they eventually arrive at a singular design solution. Studying how these tools can influence the design outcome has the potential to enable designers to become more aware of the choices they make when they choose to use a tool. Because so much of the cost of a product is determined during the early stages of product development, reviewing these design alternatives with stakeholders is a valuable part of the process. Understanding how stakeholders respond to a design representation is vital to interpreting potential user feedback accurately In this dissertation, I investigate these questions about early-stage design process: I. How does the use of a specific design tool influence the design outcome? II. What design attributes do designers associate with these tools? In Part I of this research, designers made sketches, foam model prototypes, or CAD models in a controlled experiment. Followed by a survey of the designs with potential users, Part I demonstrated how different design tools affect the quantity and quality of ideas, including that designs created as prototypes were recognized as more novel, more aesthetically pleasing, and more comfortable to use. In Part II, in a survey of designers with experience in sketching, foam models, and CAD, designs from Part I were re-represented as sketches. Experienced designers exhibited a better-than-random likelihood to identify the original tool used to create the design, despite viewing only the re-sketch. This suggests artifacts of a design tool persist in a design representation despite the design being translated from one medium to another.
Description
Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2016.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages [58]-[60]).
Subjects
Mechanical Engineering.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Terms of Use
MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission.
Persistent DSpace Link
